Monday 21 October 2013

Flooding India with improving "Doing Business" reports


          UPA lets ministries vie for studies on improving 'Doing Business in India'


Initiating and flaunting studies on improving business environment is becoming the latest fad in the Indian Government. Different entities in the UPA Government just want to be perceived as making easier 'doing business in India' as their business. Don't expect them to act on countless ideas and suggestions made by numerous official committees on macro, micro and sector-specific reforms. After all, that is not their business.
The latest race to improve business environment started with the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) releasing the report of the Committee for Reforming the Regulatory Environment for Doing Business in India (DBI) in September 2013. The Committee chaired by ex-Sebi chairman, M. Damodaran, has made suggestions whose sincere implementation can help the country remain in double-digit growth mode in perpetuity.

A few days after the release of Damodaran committee report, Planning Commission also made public a similar report titled ‘Towards an Optimal Business Regulatory Framework in India’. This has been prepared by Implementation Group for 12th five year plan in association with Booz & Company.
This report has approached the subject in different manner while making valuable recommendations on different issues, some of which such as labour reforms are political untouchable.
As put by the report, “The hallmark of any analysis is the degree to which the recommendations are actually implemented.”
One does not know whether Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP) mandarins or its boss, Minister for Commerce and Industry Anand Sharma, spared some time to read these two reports before deciding to commission their own study.
What we know is that DIPP is currently scouting for a consultancy firm via the tendering route for launching a Study on “Improving the Business Environment in India”.
Explaining the rationale for the proposed study, DIPP says: “It is estimated that about 650 million people in the country constituting around 61 percent of the population are in the working age group of 15-59 years. It is estimated that an additional about 200 million Indians will enter the job market in next 15 years. Inclusive growth is possible only if all workers have access to opportunities for employment and entrepreneurship. If India has to grow at 9 to 10% per annum, manufacturing has to grow at 13 to 14% per annum through an enabling policy framework and reduced logistic costs.”
It adds: “Unlocking the job potential and growth of the economy calls for accelerating the pace of investments. At a time when there is an intense competition among counties to attract investments and produce goods and services at competitive costs, the quality of business environment plays a critical role in determining the level as well as pace of investment in the country. As India is ranked poorly in the ease of doing business, it is imperative to identify issues which impact the business environment in the country adversely and suggest policy actions accordingly.”
Indian Establishment should take a leaf out of Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) to coordinate its disjointed and over-lapping efforts at improving business environment in India.
As put by a recent document by APEC, “Improving the region’s business regulatory environment is a focus of APEC, and member economies have pledged to carry out regulatory reforms both collectively and unilaterally.”
It says: “Using 5 Doing Business indicator sets, the action plan targets an APEC-wide aspirational goal of making it 25% cheaper, faster and easier to do business by 2015, with an interim target of 5% improvement by 2011.”
In the run to Lok Sabha polls, can the Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh, salvage his reforms image by making business governance more transparent, rule-based and credible?
Would N. Modi-led new Government set APEC-type goals and timelines, assuming its formation has brightest prospects in the existing political flux and governance mess?